22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 479 · reblog
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 11191 · reblog
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 1740 · reblog
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 5889 · reblog

gabifresh:

The gabifresh x swimsuitsforall bikini has been restocked and is now available to buy here! For more photos from this shoot, check out gabifresh.com! If you reblog, please keep this caption <3

22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 20679 · reblog · Tags
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 241257 · reblog
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 36849 · reblog
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 89950 · reblog
Dread drama →

dynastylnoire:

note-a-bear:

opinionated-light:

note-a-bear:

roropcoldchain:

dumbthingswhitepplsay:

letthetruthlaugh:

dumbthingswhitepplsay:

failedblackwoman:

dumbthingswhitepplsay:

white allies, come collect this shit

You know why I hate white people dreads? Because I’m selfish, it doesn’t mean anything to them and I personally think they’re gross. The lazy method? Shit’s nasty. That honey goo method? That’s gross too, when a part of getting dreads is that you can’t wash your hair. Don’t do it. 

As a black woman hair is a huge part of my life/culture what have you. My mother promised herself she would never perm/relax my hair, know what happened? People insulted her choice, they told her that my hair was “out of control” and that it would look soooo much better relaxed and that she should think of the future because having nappy hair isn’t “professional.” 

My mother listened, fast forward a few years she finally stopped and allowed me to get locks like she had. My locks have come to mean something to me, I won’t allow myself to be pressured to change my hair back to “meet the needs of others.”

I have been told that my locks aren’t “professional” looking and that I should consider cutting them off, wearing wigs and then going back to perming my hair like I should be afraid of its original texture. 

I no longer accept the backwards compliment of “If it wasn’t locked your hair would be so long.” I no longer accept “You should take them out and straighten it.” Because fuck that noise. I am not afraid of my natural hair, it is not a curse, and if you don’t think my locks are professional you can take a step back, and fuck your own face. 

I hate white people dreads because I don’t think they appreciate the privilege of their naturally straight hair, I don’t think they understand the struggle with ethnic hair. They don’t know how many people would love to have their straight hair and yet they go and put nasty shit in it and then don’t wash it and go “Look at me I’m a rebel.”

Reblogging because seriously white people. Seriously.

Well, the Celts did have dreadlocks. The Romans reported Celtic warriors as having “hair like snakes,” which has been taken to imply that they had dreadlocks. Its also been recorded that Germanic tribes, Greeks, and Vikings often wore dreadlocks as all. So as far as historically speaking, there is plenty of precedent for white people having dreads. Its also considered to have Biblical origins, with Delilah cutting off Samson’s “seven locks.”

So I’m going to say, yeah, its not appropriative for white people to have dreads. My ethnic ancestory is Celtic/Viking, both of which have been recorded as historically having dreads. I would never get dreads, but still.

The earliest recording, I believe, is Egypt where dreads are seen in hieroglyphs.

As for the entire rest of “Rafiki’s” post (spiritual name? wtf?), I’m not even going to touch that. As someone with Scottish ancestry who’s Scottish relatives came to the US and worked their asses off, I’m not sure what the hell this Scottish people being lazy bullshit is.

this was the wrong conversation to butt in the middle of if you are white

Couple things: Samson and Delilah probably weren’t “white” as the ideology exists today…and neither were the Egyptians (people from Kemet…”land of the blacks”.) So…maybe those two groups shouldn’t be used to bolster your point?

I tried real hard not to butt in on this, but I ahve to say:

Germanic, Gallic, and Celtic hairstyles, prior to Roman Conquest, and subsequent Anglo-/Germanic empire-building were absolutely not dreadlocks as we speak of them.

What I will concede to is that there were traditions of matting, plaiting, and braiding hair. The Roman references to “hair like snakes” could just as easily be speaking to long hair, since, as an essentially Mediterranean nation, Rome generally ascribed to short hair for those citizens in power. The military (through which nearly every Roman-born citizen and sub-citizen had to pass upon achieving adulthood) required short hair. Short hair was considered the standard for Romans.

Having gotten that out of the way, we can move on to what they would have seen from almost every non-Roman/non-warm weather nation they came across: Long, matted, braided, or otherwise “unkempt” hair by their standards. Hence, “hair of snakes.” Never mind that if you look at the other big Greco-Roman reference to “hair of snakes” (Medusa), archaeologists and anthropologists have ascribed that hair to the what would be considered, by our standards, mussed, dirtied, or generally “unrefined” hairstyles.

So, that brings us back to the Gauls, the Celts, the Saxons, the (Visi-, Ostro-) Goths, the Vandals, the Angles, and just about everyone North of what is now Italy. All those tribes had traditions of plaiting hair. They also, did not have the same traditions of cutting hair that the Romans did.

That is the only conceit I will give in this matter of dreadlocks.

Also, let’s be real, the Romans were notoriously unreliable observers when it came to the people north of contemporary Italy. Half of their references to the people of the North were to call them “Black” or some variation thereof.

So, y’know, don’t use the Romans to bolster your argument, in general.

I normally don’t bother putting my two cents in about dreadlocks (as a white  girl I don’t really think its my place) but I do know a few things about celtic ‘dreadlocks,’ which is why I get annoyed when people of celtic decent use their heritage to justify having dreadlocks. 

For one thing they weren’t even called dreadlocks they’re gleebs, I think the term dreadlock in itself is an appropriated term. Another thing is they weren’t made like any of the modern dreadlocks we see today. They were most commonly worn by warriors going into battle who would matt their hair and then cake it with mud/clay to make intimidating shapes to scare their enemies. This could therefore mean they were more like punk spikes than dreadlocks. Some however did just cake their matts with mud and leave them down so they could look a bit like modern dreadlocks. But it could be argued unless you cake your hair with mud you can’t use being a celt to justify having dreadlocks. Some people think the celts had matted hair because they were barbarians who never washed or brushed their hair which could be equally true, and some white people do make dreadlocks this way. But that is disgusting in my opinion and it is part of the reason dreadlocks have such a bad reputation, so if you have hair like that I suggest you just call it matted and not dreadlocked.

I will admit that there was a form of gleeb worn by the wealthier celts which may seem more appealing. They would have twisted their hair and tied pretty yarns around it, similar to a lot of white people with dreadlocks today. However these were not matted they were twists, perhaps they were similar to the twist and pull dreadlock making method but the structure of them were different. I’ve experimented with this form of gleeb on my hair, which is very stereotypical celtic hair (think Merida in Brave) and the twists do stay in due to the curl and dryness of my hair. However when I tried it on my sister who has only a gentle wave it was impossible, her hair was far too fine and slippy. They can be brushed out but I was also able to wash my hair and they remained intact when I did not use conditioner in the areas with gleebs I just had to tidy them a bit. I only kept them in for a month so perhaps over time the feel of them would have changed to a more dreadlock type form but they did look more like twists than dreadlocks. 

In my opinion you shouldn’t use being celtic as an excuse to have dreadlocks. Celtic gleebs were a different thing and anyone uses being celtic as an excuse they should do their research into it first and know not to call them dreadlocks. It is very difficult to find any references for gleebs, I came across it in obscure texts in my university library whilst researching ancient irish textiles and was interested so I looked into it a bit more. As it is written about in so few places and they often refer to the same clans, I assume only a few clans actually wore gleebs, perhaps all these clans had very curly hair like mines making it possible to make gleebs. 

Have I ever mentioned how relieved I am when I check the notes on something and find actual, useful commentary from white folks?

If I haven’t I’m saying it now


22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 1207 · reblog
22 Apr 14 · via · credit · 61497 · reblog
theme.